ActiVote
← All analysis
August 2, 2021

Legal Representation in Eviction Court

The federal eviction moratorium which was created to stop evictions during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic ended on July 31st. It is widely believed that this will lead to a spike in eviction proceedings and evictions in the coming weeks and months.

During eviction proceedings, landlords often have legal representation, while renters do not. Recent legislation in NY has shown that if renters have a guaranteed right of legal representation, they are less likely to be evicted.

We wondered what the country thinks about legal representation in eviction court, now that evictions are likely to spike after the moratorium expired. We asked over 4,000ActiVote users the question and gave them five answers to pick from:

  • Tenants should have legal representation, and further protections from eviction should be provided.
  • Tenants should have legal representation in all eviction proceedings.
  • Only low-income tenants should receive free legal representation, others should pay at least partly for such representation.
  • If the system makes lawyers available to tenants, then it should also provide them to landlords.
  • There should be no laws guaranteeing representation.

It turns out that 44% of people believe that all renters should be provided with legal representation in eviction court, while another 30% believe that support provided should be income dependent. The remaining 26% believe that if support is provided it should go to both landlords and renters, or to neither of them.

The headline result
legal representation and further protections
27%
legal representation
17%
income dependent
30%
support for both tenants and landlords
16%
no guarantee
10%
See the details below →

As could be expected, voters with lower incomes are more supportive of providing legal representation: 57% believe everyone should receive it, and another 27% believe it should be income-dependent. Among the well-to-do, there is a three way split: 1/3 believes everyone should get legal representation, 1/3 believes it should be income dependent and the final 3rd believes that either nobody should get it, or both landlords and tenants should.

The crosstabs
<50k
36%
21%
27%
9%
50k-100k
32%
12%
29%
19%
>100k
14%
20%
33%
18%
15%
legal representation and further protectionslegal representationincome dependentsupport for both tenants and landlordsno guarantee
See the details below →

There is a significant difference between the parties: virtually all Democrats (91%) would like to see legal representation for either all or those with the lowest incomes. Among Republicans only 53% feel that way.

The crosstabs
Dem
40%
23%
29%
Rep
14%
17%
21%
28%
18%
Ind
26%
17%
39%
12%
legal representation and further protectionslegal representationincome dependentsupport for both tenants and landlordsno guarantee
See the details below →

While there are some groups who do not favor providing legal representation to renters, they are consistently a minority, even among Republicans. Perhaps the overarching sentiment driving support for legal representation is that people believe that it helps make sure that people are not unnecessarily or wrongly evicted, thus, it creates a more level playing field, while still protecting the rights of property owners.

During the last economic downturn many people lost their homes, including significant numbers who were wrongfully foreclosed on. Only time will tell whether there will be a spike in evictions in the coming period and whether some of those could have been prevented by providing the renters with legal representation.

The Details